CASE STUDY A:
+150% Growth in <2 Years
COMPANY TYPE:
SaaS Address Verification
ARR:
$10M
GROWTH:
40%
HEADQUARTERS:
Utah, USA
SITUATION
- Growing at ~40% per year and was on track to hit $10M ARR
- Had profitably bootstrapped from creation
- Never strategically reviewed packaging and pricing nor optimized pricing
PROBLEM
- No premium offer to capture enterprises’ higher WTP
- Not monetizing differentiated values in the market that carried with them higher WTP
- No tiering or bundling of offers—only volume-based pricing
SOLUTIONS
- Introduced two new tiers sets (business and enterprises) with 3 offers differentiated by features, intensity of features, volume of units, and availability of add-ons
- Optimized pricing for both tiers sets and add-ons to influence higher price point
- Trained team on value proposition and discounting strategy/tactic for enterprises
KEY LEARNINGS
- Packaging (i.e., offer creation and tiering design) are just as important as optimizing pricing.
- Even high growth companies can perform better—especially with enterprise customers.
- Often there are value drivers and differentiators that should be monetized but aren’t.
CASE STUDY B:
+$32M in Annual Margin Growth
COMPANY TYPE:
Pharmaceutical Distributor
ANNUAL REVENUE:
$300M (focused business unit)
EBIDTA:
$145M (focused business unit)
HEADQUARTERS:
Ohio, USA
SITUATION
• Declining stock price and stagnant growth on profitable generics business
• Large portfolio of products with limited team to manage prices
PROBLEM
• No systemic process in place to actively manage long-tail of products
• High margin variation and leakage across product portfolio
• Complex rebates & off-invoice adjustments complicates net profitability
SOLUTIONS
• Optimized portfolio mix to increase sales on high margin products and removed products with low margins
• Incorporated rebate forecasts into price setting to eliminate negative margin deals
• Segmented long-tail products and set floor margins to maximize profitability and reduce variation
KEY LEARNINGS
• Companies have significant flexibility to drive price-growth on long-tail products
• It is difficult to avoid negative margin deals without a holistic picture on total deal profitability
CASE STUDY C:
Increased Margin By $2.3M
COMPANY TYPE:
IT Managed Service Provider
ANNUAL REVENUE:
$100M
EBIDTA:
$35M
HEADQUARTERS:
Maine, USA
SITUATION
- Portco not seeing the expected value after multiple acquisitions
- Margins falling and customer service lagging
- Customer and staff churn
PROBLEM
- Lack of integration and a proliferation of SKUs hid true costs making it difficult to measure or manage customer and product profitability
- Product were not based on trackable units; bundles were not scalable; cost+ pricing
SOLUTIONS
- Standardized the offer and decreased the SKU count by 40% driving lower vendor costs, increased cost visibility, and increased service levels
- Provided pricing benchmarks (Hi-Median-Lo) from industry leading sources focused on mid to large competitors providing insight into pricing opportunities
KEY LEARNINGS
- A perceived ‘pricing problem’ may be a symptom of deeper problems that need to be scoped
- Integrating a company well includes aligning product and pricing strategies
REFERENCES
1: FCIC Interview with Warren Buffett. May 26, 2010. https://fcic-static.law.stanford.edu/NARA.FCIC.2016-03-11/SCREENED%20Interviews/
2: 2022 OpenView SaaS Benchmarks Report. https://openviewpartners.com/2022-saas-benchmarks-report/
3: McKinsey & Company. Pricing: The next frontier of value creation in private equity. October 21, 2019. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/growth-marketing-and-sales/our-insights/pricing-the-next-frontier-of-value-creation-in-private-equity
4: 2022 OpenView SaaS Benchmarks Report. https://openviewpartners.com/2022-saas-benchmarks-report/